Request for Review of Arrest

ADANA SULH FOR PENALTY PRISON

Query No:

SUSPECT AGAINST:

DEPUTY:

CRIME: Threat with Gun.

D. SUBJECT: It consists of a request for a review of the detention status.

The suspect, whose defense I am, was questioned by the Adana Chief Public Prosecutor's Office and sent to the court with a request for his arrest. As a result of the query made by the court, the suspects CMK mad. According to 100, it was decided to arrest him.

Past status of the suspect, presence of fixed residence, collection of evidence etc. It is certain that the conditions for the arrest are not met and that the detention will cause irreparable damages for my client and his family in the future.

*** IT MUST BE IMPORTANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THE SUSPECT CLIENT AHMET IS PATIENT WITH “OLIGOPRENIA AT DEBELITY LEVEL”. FOR THIS REASON, THERE ARE INSUFFICIENT AND DEFICIENCIES IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF MENTAL TALENTS. THIS SITUATION OF THE SUSPICIOUS CLIENT WAS DETECTED DURING THE INQUIRY STAGE, BUT IT CANNOT BE SUPPLIED TO THE FILE BECAUSE THE REPORT IS NOT AVAILABLE AT THE TIME. WE ARE SUPPLYING THE HEALTH REPORT OF SUSPECT CLIENT AHMET THAT WE HAVE OBTAINED AT THE ATTACHMENT TO OUR Petition. (Annex-1: Health report of the suspect client)

Blackening the suspect's evidence, etc. Being arrested without any risk is also against the public interest. When these issues are taken into consideration during the trial phase, the nature of the crime will change in favor of the suspect or it will disappear completely. For this reason, it became necessary to ask for the removal of the detention.

RESULT: Along with the reasons we have stated and the reasons that your esteemed judge will automatically appreciate;

1) Removal of the arrest warrant given for the suspect client, BY OBJECTION, and that the suspect be tried pending trial,

2) If your jurisdiction disagrees; conversion of the arrest warrant into "Judicial Control" in accordance with the provisions of CMK Article 109; If your esteemed judge thinks otherwise, I respectfully submit and request that the file be sent to Adana Criminal Judgeship based on our objection.

Doubtful Defense

  • First published: 24 August 2024

About the Author: Lawyer Saim İncekaş

Saim İncekaş is a lawyer registered with Adana Bar Association. He has been working at İncekaş Law Firm, which he founded, based in Adana, since 2016. After completing his law education with a master's degree, he carried out many different studies in this field. He is an expert in areas such as family law, divorce, custody cases, children's rights, criminal cases, commercial disputes, real estate, inheritance and labor law. Saim İncekaş is actively involved not only in the Adana Bar Association, but also in associations and organizations such as the European Lawyers Association, the Union of Turkish Bar Associations and Access to the Right to a Fair Trial. In this way, it takes part in many studies aimed at increasing awareness of the universality of law and confidence in the legal system. Contact Us Now via WhatsApp for an Appointment and Preliminary Meeting

Write a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields * Required fields are marked with

Reach us on WhatsApp!